Members' is correct as member's would mean that there is only one member. Also, re the correctness or otherwise of your third option, you might want to read this recent thread.
Members online n.ares polishbeginner Sowka Traductora-traidora Au101 Glitzy Mitzy lingobingo pebblespebbles Jeff2000 Gobi4657 Un Adorador terepl Akane Azumino A Star is Born analeeh djmc Rainbovv_22 Yendred DiBaca RodrigoFV Total: 13,469 (members: 33, guests: 13,436) Forum statistics Threads 3,804,441 Messages 20,692,163 Members 815,577 Latest ...
Hi, guys! I am aware that "staff members" and "members of the staff" are both correct and mean the same. I also know that "all of the" and "all" are both correct and mean the same (except before a pronoun, case in which "all of" is required). Is there any problem in using any of the phrases...
Is it acceptable to write family members in a formal context, or should it be members of the family? For example. you should not let your family members...
I just saw a notice in a restaurant: All staff must wash their hands after using the toilet. Is this use of "all staff" correct? I think it should read "all staff members" or "all employees" because "staff" is a group noun. What do you think?
In the U.S., the name of the organization is Boy Scouts of America, so we capitalize "Boy Scout" when referring to members of that organization. Over here, scouting does not seem to be affected by the movement towards gender neutrality.
The team members arrived home today. It can also be confusing because of differences in usage in Briitsh English or in American English, or even regional differences.
If the group is composed of members who collectively individually have ten years of experience I would say "a group whose members have an average of (or collectively have) ten years experience. The sentences would be parsed differently, too: We are are (a group [of programers]) that has ten years experience.